![]() ![]() Particularly given the cost of, and public opposition to, new pipelines. In response to the move towards net-zero carbon emissions, operators in the US are considering if and how existing natural gas pipelines can be converted to blended or 100% hydrogen service. Simon Slater 1, Neil Gallon 2, Ryan Sager 3, Richard Ingolia 3, Sebastiaan Schuite 3ġROSEN, Columbus, USA, 2ROSEN, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 3ROSEN, Houston, USA Evaluating the Suitability of the US Pipeline Network for Hydrogen service A development roadmap will be reviewed illustrating the path to fully automating all functions performed by human observers, including detection of ground movement, riverbank erosion, marker counting and localisation, exposure of pipelines after serious weather events, and automation of class location determination.Ģ. Real-life operational results will be covered including latency in detection, volume of data to be manipulated, cloud computing aspects as well as operational “up time” that can be expected. Statistics on detection performance will be presented, including unplanned threats and simulated (hidden) leaks. The paper will also review how new technologies can provide operators with a complementary tool that provides consistent, repeatable, and automated detection of high-priority threats to the integrity of pipelines. The paper will discuss the technology and system capabilities with details outlining detection of unauthorized 3rd party activity (machinery, abnormal construction activities), as well as generation of high definition 2D orthomosaics and 3D point cloud, vegetation analysis and digital surface ground mapping of the entire length of a 500-meter-wide ROW. Capabilities developed by Flyscan in collaboration with Enbridge include real-time hyperspectral leak detection and location and reporting of threats in the right-of-way. This paper presents the first real-life results of a test campaign performed by Flyscan Systems over ROW’s of seven operators in seven US states and two Canadian provinces. 2Enbridge Pipelines, Edmonton, Canadaįor years, pipeline operators have relied on human observers flying at low altitude to perform the mandated visual inspections of their right-of-way (ROW), often completed in single pilot-observer configuration, without any automatic documentation or detection system. Damage Prevention 2.0 : Analysis of operational data from an automated ROW airborne visual inspection of seven pipelines: crude oil leak detection, 3rd party encroachment detection and advanced image documentation.Įric Bergeron 1, Alexandre Thibeault 1, Ray Philipenko 2ġFlyscan Systems Inc., Quebec, Canada. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.Īs a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business.9. ![]() BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.īBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.īBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |